Y: Today, on "A Moment of Science," we clear up the difference between a scientific      theory and a scientific law.

D: Let me guess. You're talking about that argument that if the theory of evolution were      true, it would actually be a law.

Y: Yes--I'm tired of hearing people argue that the fact that evolution is a theory means      that modern science itself isn't convinced it really happens.

D: Yeah, me too.

Y: And that's why I thought it's worth going over the terminology one more time.

D: Well, the definition of a law is easy. It's a description--usually mathematical--of some      aspect of the natural world.

Y: Like gravity.

D: Exactly. The law of gravity describes and quantifies the attraction between two      objects. But the law of gravity doesn't explain what gravity is or why it might work in      this way. That's because that kind of explanation falls into the realm of theory. And      the theory that explains gravity is the theory of general relativity.

Y: Right. According to the National Academy of Sciences, a scientific theory is a "well-      substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate      facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." In other words, all scientific theories      are supported by evidence, and you can test them, and--most importantly--you can      use them to make predictions.

D: So based on that definition, theories never change into laws, no matter how much      evidence out there supports them. Formulating theories, in fact, is the end goal of      science.

Y: So to say evolution is just a theory is actually an argument for it and not against it.      You can't do any better in science than to be a theory.  

To hear this program click here

A Moment of Science®